Skip to Content
Main content

JORDAN-ELBRIDGE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

113

24%

LEVEL 2

180

38%

LEVEL 3

146

31%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

107

23%

LEVEL 2

180

39%

LEVEL 3

117

25%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

65

28%

LEVEL 2

92

40%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

169
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

104

24%

LEVEL 2

169

38%

LEVEL 3

137

31%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

95

22%

LEVEL 2

174

40%

LEVEL 3

110

25%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

156

38%

LEVEL 3

142

35%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

75

19%

LEVEL 2

156

39%

LEVEL 3

114

28%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

36

56%

LEVEL 2

24

38%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

32

54%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

112

24%

LEVEL 2

180

38%

LEVEL 3

143

31%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

175
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

105

23%

LEVEL 2

178

39%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

80

44%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

87

44%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

179
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

109

23%

LEVEL 2

177

38%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

174
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

106

23%

LEVEL 2

176

39%

LEVEL 3

116

25%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.