GILLETTE ROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 836

LEVEL 1

203

24%

LEVEL 2

279

33%

LEVEL 3

242

29%

LEVEL 4

112

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

404
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 913

LEVEL 1

212

23%

LEVEL 2

297

33%

LEVEL 3

225

25%

LEVEL 4

179

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

179
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

114

29%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

146

35%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

89

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

175
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

131

29%

LEVEL 2

142

32%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

202
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

138

28%

LEVEL 2

151

31%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

90

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

15

48%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

307
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

166

23%

LEVEL 2

235

33%

LEVEL 3

207

29%

LEVEL 4

100

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

345
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 771

LEVEL 1

174

23%

LEVEL 2

252

33%

LEVEL 3

186

24%

LEVEL 4

159

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

8

26%

LEVEL 2

14

45%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

352
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 752

LEVEL 1

140

19%

LEVEL 2

260

35%

LEVEL 3

240

32%

LEVEL 4

112

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

395
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 811

LEVEL 1

137

17%

LEVEL 2

279

34%

LEVEL 3

218

27%

LEVEL 4

177

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

63

75%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

75

74%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

301
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

118

19%

LEVEL 2

202

33%

LEVEL 3

202

33%

LEVEL 4

99

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

321
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

125

19%

LEVEL 2

221

33%

LEVEL 3

177

27%

LEVEL 4

144

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

85

40%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

87

35%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

48

20%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

353
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 830

LEVEL 1

200

24%

LEVEL 2

277

33%

LEVEL 3

242

29%

LEVEL 4

111

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

401
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 899

LEVEL 1

204

23%

LEVEL 2

294

33%

LEVEL 3

224

25%

LEVEL 4

177

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.