GENERAL HERKIMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

118

32%

LEVEL 2

121

33%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

150

36%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

103

25%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

60

31%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

71

32%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

58

34%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

79

41%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

19

37%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

23

40%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

19

33%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

42
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

38

30%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

35

45%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

38

40%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

30

38%

LEVEL 2

27

34%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

40

45%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

91

28%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

101

29%

LEVEL 2

110

31%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

27

63%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

49

78%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

119
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

139
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

94

27%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

40

59%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

56

86%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

22

44%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

107

34%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

143

39%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

124
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

115

32%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

139

35%

LEVEL 2

120

30%

LEVEL 3

100

25%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.