SHERRILL CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

166

26%

LEVEL 2

243

38%

LEVEL 3

183

29%

LEVEL 4

47

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 724

LEVEL 1

176

24%

LEVEL 2

279

39%

LEVEL 3

194

27%

LEVEL 4

75

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

104

34%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

70

20%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

110

32%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

107

32%

LEVEL 2

134

40%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

106

28%

LEVEL 2

156

41%

LEVEL 3

84

22%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

222
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

152

25%

LEVEL 2

232

38%

LEVEL 3

176

29%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

259
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

167

24%

LEVEL 2

266

38%

LEVEL 3

185

27%

LEVEL 4

74

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

110

20%

LEVEL 2

227

40%

LEVEL 3

180

32%

LEVEL 4

47

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

115

18%

LEVEL 2

254

40%

LEVEL 3

187

30%

LEVEL 4

75

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

56

75%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

61

66%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

68

19%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

152

39%

LEVEL 3

121

31%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

98

34%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

112

33%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

268
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 719

LEVEL 1

174

24%

LEVEL 2

277

39%

LEVEL 3

194

27%

LEVEL 4

74

10%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

268
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 719

LEVEL 1

174

24%

LEVEL 2

277

39%

LEVEL 3

193

27%

LEVEL 4

75

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.