Skip to Content
Main content

LYNDON H STROUGH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

101

34%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

145

40%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

63

45%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

54

33%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

71

46%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

91

46%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

110

38%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

12

50%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

73

29%

LEVEL 2

99

39%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

28

74%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

51

80%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

52

42%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

85

50%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

120

52%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

25

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

84
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

97

34%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

92
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

142

40%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.