BARKER CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

97

33%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

53

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

42

35%

LEVEL 4

29

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

50

35%

LEVEL 4

34

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

43

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

15

65%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

83

35%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

98

37%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

55

41%

LEVEL 4

30

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

60

37%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

27

22%

LEVEL 2

51

42%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

151
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

100

34%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

152
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

100

35%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.