Skip to Content
Main content

PS 44 THOMAS C BROWN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

168

46%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

47

13%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

175

50%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

39

11%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

73

42%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

76

44%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

95

51%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

99

54%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

76

52%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

73

52%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

78

41%

LEVEL 2

80

42%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

94

52%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

104

47%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

73

35%

LEVEL 2

92

44%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

98

69%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

9

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

102

72%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

149

44%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

155

47%

LEVEL 2

123

38%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

19

70%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

20

77%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

159

47%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

45

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

168

50%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

149

46%

LEVEL 2

129

39%

LEVEL 3

41

13%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

46
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

153

48%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

35

11%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.