Skip to Content
Main content

PS 18 JOHN G WHITTIER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

68

29%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

19

20%

LEVEL 2

38

40%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

45

36%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

41

33%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

35

32%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

30

33%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

27

27%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

40

39%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

54

40%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

50

39%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

53

53%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

37

40%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

63

28%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

77

37%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

66

30%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

67
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

60

30%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.