Skip to Content
Main content

PS 30 WESTERLEIGH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

155

42%

LEVEL 4

86

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

57

14%

LEVEL 2

90

23%

LEVEL 3

176

44%

LEVEL 4

75

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

82

43%

LEVEL 4

49

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

81

42%

LEVEL 4

43

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

73

40%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

95

47%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

8

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

19

43%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

96

43%

LEVEL 4

60

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

48

21%

LEVEL 3

106

46%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

35

38%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

39

40%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

127

46%

LEVEL 4

83

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

61

20%

LEVEL 3

154

51%

LEVEL 4

72

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

32

34%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

43

44%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

239
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

80

23%

LEVEL 3

153

44%

LEVEL 4

86

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

247
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

83

22%

LEVEL 3

172

46%

LEVEL 4

75

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

12

63%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

34

15%

LEVEL 3

116

51%

LEVEL 4

65

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

124

51%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

234
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

83

23%

LEVEL 3

149

42%

LEVEL 4

85

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

246
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

88

23%

LEVEL 3

173

44%

LEVEL 4

73

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.