Skip to Content
Main content

IS 204 OLIVER W HOLMES GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

128

29%

LEVEL 2

153

34%

LEVEL 3

112

25%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

138

32%

LEVEL 2

128

30%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

88

35%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

86

37%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

30

41%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

17

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

29

38%

LEVEL 2

33

43%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

40

47%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

97
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

77

29%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

75

30%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

103

31%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

70

62%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

72

64%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

112

30%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

111

30%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

54

78%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

47

70%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

12

28%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

120

29%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

104

25%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

126

32%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

104

27%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

156
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

118

28%

LEVEL 2

142

34%

LEVEL 3

104

25%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

153
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

126

32%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.