Skip to Content
Main content

PS 212 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

145

41%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

146

42%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

68

42%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

72

41%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

77

40%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

74

44%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

45

48%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

69
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

51

51%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

22

56%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

84

38%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

69

35%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

136

44%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

138

46%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

23

49%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

197
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

136

44%

LEVEL 4

61

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

182
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

137

46%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

19

43%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

56

42%

LEVEL 4

32

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

64

47%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

89

40%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

82

39%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.