PS 85 JUDGE CHARLES VALLONE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

94

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

84

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

49

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

30

24%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

45

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

45

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

39

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

20

40%

LEVEL 4

25

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

20

42%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

46

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

45

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

26

29%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

15

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

93

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

82

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

16

44%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

177
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

94

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

84

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

15

45%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

69

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

64

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

53

39%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

20

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

176
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

92

35%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

161
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

84

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.