Skip to Content
Main content

PS 69 JACKSON HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

329
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

138

27%

LEVEL 3

220

43%

LEVEL 4

109

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

59

12%

LEVEL 2

142

29%

LEVEL 3

189

39%

LEVEL 4

96

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

184
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

120

44%

LEVEL 4

64

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

104

40%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

100

41%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

85

38%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

190
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

118

45%

LEVEL 4

72

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

174
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

111

45%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

14

52%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

108
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

79

37%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

114

25%

LEVEL 3

216

46%

LEVEL 4

106

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

38

9%

LEVEL 2

116

27%

LEVEL 3

186

43%

LEVEL 4

96

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

24

46%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

21

42%

LEVEL 2

26

52%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

311
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

98

23%

LEVEL 3

202

47%

LEVEL 4

109

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

282
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

109

26%

LEVEL 3

186

44%

LEVEL 4

96

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

26

31%

LEVEL 2

40

48%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

27

43%

LEVEL 2

33

52%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

74

44%

LEVEL 4

47

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

80

47%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

146

42%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

109

34%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

326
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

136

27%

LEVEL 3

218

43%

LEVEL 4

108

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

281
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

56

12%

LEVEL 2

139

29%

LEVEL 3

185

39%

LEVEL 4

96

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.