PS 35 NATHANIEL WOODHULL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

64

23%

LEVEL 2

118

42%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

79

27%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

62

44%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

10
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

12

46%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

26

36%

LEVEL 3

26

36%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

26

27%

LEVEL 2

41

42%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

36

36%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

33

46%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

25

31%

LEVEL 2

25

31%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

106

44%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

26

59%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

30

61%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

99
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

103

41%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

107
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

58

23%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

21

57%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

110

42%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

67

27%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

96
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

112

42%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

106
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

69

26%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

87

32%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.