PS 101 SCHOOL IN THE GARDENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

45

17%

LEVEL 3

88

33%

LEVEL 4

122

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

46

15%

LEVEL 3

124

41%

LEVEL 4

108

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

75

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

25

16%

LEVEL 3

67

42%

LEVEL 4

58

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

41

34%

LEVEL 4

47

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

57

39%

LEVEL 4

50

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

12

57%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

9

39%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

42

55%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

36

40%

LEVEL 4

39

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

56

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

56

40%

LEVEL 4

45

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

22

50%

LEVEL 4

12

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

19

46%

LEVEL 4

13

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

32

13%

LEVEL 3

80

33%

LEVEL 4

117

49%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

37

14%

LEVEL 3

116

43%

LEVEL 4

103

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

13

37%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

208
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

122

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

76

35%

LEVEL 4

99

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

40

15%

LEVEL 3

105

39%

LEVEL 4

103

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

23

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

19

50%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.