Skip to Content
Main content

PS 54 HILLSIDE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

71

25%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

50

40%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

47

32%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

51
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

18

19%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

33

34%

LEVEL 4

18

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

58
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

34

33%

LEVEL 4

24

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

54

38%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

90

38%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

19

45%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

106
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

121
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

84

41%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

30

41%

LEVEL 2

33

45%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

31

41%

LEVEL 2

28

37%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

23

39%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

20

38%

LEVEL 4

12

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

51

21%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

125
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

91

38%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

20

51%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

14

37%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.