PS 146 HOWARD BEACH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

54

13%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

182

42%

LEVEL 4

80

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

93

22%

LEVEL 3

163

39%

LEVEL 4

106

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

163
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

107

48%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

92

43%

LEVEL 4

68

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

8

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

150
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

107

43%

LEVEL 4

43

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

83

38%

LEVEL 4

60

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

93
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

65

42%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

70

41%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

165

48%

LEVEL 4

79

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

56

17%

LEVEL 3

140

43%

LEVEL 4

101

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

31

36%

LEVEL 2

37

43%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

27

29%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

259
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

50

12%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

179

42%

LEVEL 4

80

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

97

43%

LEVEL 4

53

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

87

42%

LEVEL 4

54

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

85

42%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

48

23%

LEVEL 3

76

37%

LEVEL 4

52

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

259
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

52

12%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

180

42%

LEVEL 4

79

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

266
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

90

22%

LEVEL 3

160

39%

LEVEL 4

106

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.