Skip to Content
Main content

PS 203 OAKLAND GARDENS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

383
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

58

13%

LEVEL 3

175

38%

LEVEL 4

208

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

49

12%

LEVEL 3

140

34%

LEVEL 4

215

52%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

81

39%

LEVEL 4

94

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

169
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

25

13%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

106

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

208
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

31

13%

LEVEL 3

94

38%

LEVEL 4

114

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

186
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

109

50%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

302
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

39

11%

LEVEL 3

127

37%

LEVEL 4

175

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

278
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

31

10%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

180

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

25

44%

LEVEL 4

23

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

22

43%

LEVEL 4

17

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

15

48%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

16

48%

LEVEL 4

10

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

365
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

40

10%

LEVEL 3

161

39%

LEVEL 4

204

50%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

344
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

33

9%

LEVEL 3

132

35%

LEVEL 4

212

55%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

14

31%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

366
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

45

11%

LEVEL 3

160

38%

LEVEL 4

206

49%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

339
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

38

10%

LEVEL 3

125

32%

LEVEL 4

214

56%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

15

39%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

15

48%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

23

9%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

132

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

16

7%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

140

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

35

16%

LEVEL 3

91

43%

LEVEL 4

76

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

33

18%

LEVEL 3

70

38%

LEVEL 4

75

41%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.