Skip to Content
Main content

PS 165 EDITH K BERGTRAUM GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

113

34%

LEVEL 4

92

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

104

35%

LEVEL 4

83

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

65

38%

LEVEL 4

48

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

45

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

44

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

38

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

151
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

79

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

131
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

26

15%

LEVEL 3

68

39%

LEVEL 4

63

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

24

44%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

15

27%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

21

38%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

108

41%

LEVEL 4

88

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

40

17%

LEVEL 3

94

40%

LEVEL 4

82

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

36

54%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

34

56%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

202
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

110

37%

LEVEL 4

92

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

183
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

100

38%

LEVEL 4

83

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

27

34%

LEVEL 4

29

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

30

36%

LEVEL 4

32

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

40

19%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

51

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

197
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

67

22%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

88

28%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

80

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.