Skip to Content
Main content

PS 22 THOMAS JEFFERSON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

50

12%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

151

37%

LEVEL 4

104

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

99

25%

LEVEL 3

173

44%

LEVEL 4

88

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

76

38%

LEVEL 4

54

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

39

20%

LEVEL 3

94

48%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

79

39%

LEVEL 4

42

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

166
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

44

18%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

82

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

184
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

40

17%

LEVEL 3

114

47%

LEVEL 4

70

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

60

41%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

135

39%

LEVEL 4

100

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

75

22%

LEVEL 3

163

47%

LEVEL 4

82

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

22

36%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

24

49%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

205
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

107

42%

LEVEL 4

98

39%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

210
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

44

16%

LEVEL 3

125

46%

LEVEL 4

85

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

39

26%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

55

43%

LEVEL 3

48

38%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

17

45%

LEVEL 4

15

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

20

48%

LEVEL 4

18

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

134

37%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

223
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

153

43%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

239
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

88

24%

LEVEL 3

142

38%

LEVEL 4

97

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

250
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

163

44%

LEVEL 4

87

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

7

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.