Skip to Content
Main content

PS 20 JOHN BOWNE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

87

16%

LEVEL 2

161

30%

LEVEL 3

189

35%

LEVEL 4

107

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

144

29%

LEVEL 3

173

35%

LEVEL 4

87

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

247
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

122

29%

LEVEL 3

159

38%

LEVEL 4

88

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

209
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

98

27%

LEVEL 3

137

38%

LEVEL 4

72

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

31

30%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

177

38%

LEVEL 4

107

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

113

27%

LEVEL 3

163

38%

LEVEL 4

85

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

33

43%

LEVEL 2

32

42%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

30

41%

LEVEL 2

31

42%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

279
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

174

41%

LEVEL 4

105

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

240
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

42

11%

LEVEL 2

108

28%

LEVEL 3

156

40%

LEVEL 4

84

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

51

41%

LEVEL 2

55

45%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

51

48%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

12

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

15

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

83

16%

LEVEL 2

155

30%

LEVEL 3

182

35%

LEVEL 4

95

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

83

19%

LEVEL 2

131

29%

LEVEL 3

161

36%

LEVEL 4

72

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

284
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

73

14%

LEVEL 2

154

30%

LEVEL 3

181

35%

LEVEL 4

103

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

251
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

87

18%

LEVEL 2

134

28%

LEVEL 3

168

36%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.