PS 12 JAMES B COLGATE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

341
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

90

15%

LEVEL 2

153

26%

LEVEL 3

230

39%

LEVEL 4

111

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

331
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

81

14%

LEVEL 2

148

26%

LEVEL 3

212

38%

LEVEL 4

119

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

68

23%

LEVEL 3

108

37%

LEVEL 4

66

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

108

41%

LEVEL 4

64

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

122

42%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

159
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

104

35%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

242
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

155

47%

LEVEL 4

87

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

217
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

123

41%

LEVEL 4

94

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

91
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

107
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

84

35%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

118

24%

LEVEL 3

214

44%

LEVEL 4

109

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

112

24%

LEVEL 3

200

42%

LEVEL 4

118

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

42

44%

LEVEL 2

35

37%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

38

44%

LEVEL 2

36

41%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

330
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

110

23%

LEVEL 3

220

46%

LEVEL 4

110

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

314
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

110

24%

LEVEL 3

199

44%

LEVEL 4

115

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

48

47%

LEVEL 2

43

42%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

52

49%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

30

53%

LEVEL 4

16

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

27

42%

LEVEL 4

17

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

295
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

88

17%

LEVEL 2

144

27%

LEVEL 3

200

38%

LEVEL 4

95

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

287
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

79

16%

LEVEL 2

129

26%

LEVEL 3

185

37%

LEVEL 4

102

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

334
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

82

15%

LEVEL 2

142

25%

LEVEL 3

224

40%

LEVEL 4

110

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

311
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

70

14%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

195

38%

LEVEL 4

116

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

11

25%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

17

39%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.