Skip to Content
Main content

PS 229 EMANUEL KAPLAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

367
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

94

15%

LEVEL 2

181

28%

LEVEL 3

216

34%

LEVEL 4

151

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

396
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

101

15%

LEVEL 2

178

26%

LEVEL 3

235

35%

LEVEL 4

161

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

189
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

87

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

80

24%

LEVEL 3

113

34%

LEVEL 4

97

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

178
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

186
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

122

35%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

165
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

51

21%

LEVEL 3

86

36%

LEVEL 4

79

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

175
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

89

36%

LEVEL 4

86

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

55

41%

LEVEL 4

36

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

65

46%

LEVEL 4

32

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

7

64%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

107
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

126

25%

LEVEL 3

186

37%

LEVEL 4

146

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

368
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

35

6%

LEVEL 2

138

26%

LEVEL 3

213

39%

LEVEL 4

155

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

53

37%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

30

21%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

66

49%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

363
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

71

12%

LEVEL 2

158

27%

LEVEL 3

212

36%

LEVEL 4

151

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

393
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

73

12%

LEVEL 2

160

26%

LEVEL 3

232

37%

LEVEL 4

161

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

23

46%

LEVEL 2

23

46%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

28

57%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

39

20%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

70

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

82

41%

LEVEL 4

58

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

220
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

80

18%

LEVEL 2

142

32%

LEVEL 3

139

31%

LEVEL 4

81

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

256
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

85

18%

LEVEL 2

135

28%

LEVEL 3

153

32%

LEVEL 4

103

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

358
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

87

14%

LEVEL 2

169

28%

LEVEL 3

209

34%

LEVEL 4

149

24%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

386
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

86

14%

LEVEL 2

163

26%

LEVEL 3

229

36%

LEVEL 4

157

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.