Skip to Content
Main content

PS 88 SENECA GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

122

27%

LEVEL 2

172

38%

LEVEL 3

120

27%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

123

29%

LEVEL 2

148

35%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

95

41%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

71

32%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

44

28%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

80

32%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

78

35%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

94

25%

LEVEL 2

144

38%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

28

40%

LEVEL 2

28

40%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

38

61%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

154
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

77

20%

LEVEL 2

162

41%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

45

79%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

43

81%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

46

44%

LEVEL 3

40

38%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

43

41%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

109
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

110

32%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

112

36%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

154
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

118

27%

LEVEL 2

165

38%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

119

29%

LEVEL 2

147

36%

LEVEL 3

120

29%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.