Skip to Content
Main content

PS 19 MARINO JEANTET GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 933

LEVEL 1

259

28%

LEVEL 2

351

38%

LEVEL 3

258

28%

LEVEL 4

65

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 922

LEVEL 1

247

27%

LEVEL 2

347

38%

LEVEL 3

272

30%

LEVEL 4

56

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

184
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

101

22%

LEVEL 2

177

38%

LEVEL 3

149

32%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

185
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

103

22%

LEVEL 2

174

38%

LEVEL 3

150

32%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

158

34%

LEVEL 2

174

37%

LEVEL 3

109

23%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

144

31%

LEVEL 2

173

38%

LEVEL 3

122

27%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

26

42%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

26

55%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

282
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 859

LEVEL 1

248

29%

LEVEL 2

329

38%

LEVEL 3

229

27%

LEVEL 4

53

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

288
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 860

LEVEL 1

239

28%

LEVEL 2

333

39%

LEVEL 3

241

28%

LEVEL 4

47

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 721

LEVEL 1

138

19%

LEVEL 2

279

39%

LEVEL 3

240

33%

LEVEL 4

64

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 709

LEVEL 1

124

17%

LEVEL 2

280

39%

LEVEL 3

253

36%

LEVEL 4

52

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

121

57%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

123

58%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

239
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

60

13%

LEVEL 2

146

33%

LEVEL 3

177

40%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

265
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

48

10%

LEVEL 2

158

34%

LEVEL 3

210

45%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

84
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

199

41%

LEVEL 2

205

42%

LEVEL 3

81

17%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

199

44%

LEVEL 2

189

42%

LEVEL 3

62

14%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

36

43%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

38

41%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

296
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 850

LEVEL 1

239

28%

LEVEL 2

315

37%

LEVEL 3

240

28%

LEVEL 4

56

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

290
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 829

LEVEL 1

230

28%

LEVEL 2

309

37%

LEVEL 3

240

29%

LEVEL 4

50

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

285
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 802

LEVEL 1

214

27%

LEVEL 2

303

38%

LEVEL 3

227

28%

LEVEL 4

58

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

296
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 809

LEVEL 1

205

25%

LEVEL 2

308

38%

LEVEL 3

244

30%

LEVEL 4

52

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

45

34%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

42

37%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.