PS 49 DOROTHY BONAWIT KOLE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

458
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 717

LEVEL 1

77

11%

LEVEL 2

182

25%

LEVEL 3

243

34%

LEVEL 4

215

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

459
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

95

13%

LEVEL 2

175

24%

LEVEL 3

257

35%

LEVEL 4

202

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

251
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

86

24%

LEVEL 3

129

36%

LEVEL 4

122

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

241
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

82

24%

LEVEL 3

128

37%

LEVEL 4

113

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

207
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

114

32%

LEVEL 4

93

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

218
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

71

19%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

129

34%

LEVEL 4

89

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

96
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

48

39%

LEVEL 4

48

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

99
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

24

17%

LEVEL 3

56

40%

LEVEL 4

43

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

275
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

107

26%

LEVEL 3

141

34%

LEVEL 4

134

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

273
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

46

11%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

135

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

31

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

436
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

142

23%

LEVEL 3

226

36%

LEVEL 4

210

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

443
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

53

8%

LEVEL 2

139

22%

LEVEL 3

245

39%

LEVEL 4

198

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

35

36%

LEVEL 2

40

41%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

42

45%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

455
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 685

LEVEL 1

59

9%

LEVEL 2

171

25%

LEVEL 3

242

35%

LEVEL 4

213

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

454
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

74

11%

LEVEL 2

164

24%

LEVEL 3

252

36%

LEVEL 4

202

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

21

57%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

267
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

143

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

244
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

133

38%

LEVEL 4

111

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

119

36%

LEVEL 4

72

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

215
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

68

18%

LEVEL 2

96

25%

LEVEL 3

124

33%

LEVEL 4

91

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

447
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

71

10%

LEVEL 2

170

25%

LEVEL 3

233

34%

LEVEL 4

214

31%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

447
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

84

12%

LEVEL 2

163

23%

LEVEL 3

248

36%

LEVEL 4

199

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.