Skip to Content
Main content

PS 71 FOREST GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

84

25%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

97

34%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

59

33%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

48

30%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

47

38%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

35

35%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

38

23%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

45

17%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

95

36%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

93

40%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

39

51%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

28

48%

LEVEL 2

26

45%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

133
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

64

22%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

116
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

94

38%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

23

48%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

21

49%

LEVEL 2

19

44%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

18

44%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

75

25%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

61

25%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

126
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

96

31%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

110
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

97

37%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.