JHS 291 ROLAND HAYES GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

134

51%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

126

52%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

56

50%

LEVEL 2

38

34%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

59

49%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

78

52%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

67

55%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

24

62%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

19

56%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

106

50%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

104

52%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

93

46%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

82

44%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

41

68%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

44

77%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

78

41%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

41
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

77

42%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

56

81%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

49

83%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

130

52%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

119

52%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

39
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

92

47%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

99

51%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

42

64%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

27

56%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.