ANDRIES HUDDE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 684

LEVEL 1

151

22%

LEVEL 2

274

40%

LEVEL 3

167

24%

LEVEL 4

92

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

196

31%

LEVEL 2

224

35%

LEVEL 3

129

20%

LEVEL 4

92

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

79

26%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

103

31%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

117

35%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

76
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

37

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

37

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

21

46%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

144
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

93

23%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

105

26%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

115
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

106

29%

LEVEL 2

147

40%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

48

53%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

42

42%

LEVEL 2

34

34%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

101

18%

LEVEL 2

226

39%

LEVEL 3

157

27%

LEVEL 4

91

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

120

23%

LEVEL 2

184

35%

LEVEL 3

124

24%

LEVEL 4

92

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

50

46%

LEVEL 2

48

44%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

76

63%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

255
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

103

17%

LEVEL 2

255

42%

LEVEL 3

163

27%

LEVEL 4

92

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

216
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

120

22%

LEVEL 2

208

38%

LEVEL 3

125

23%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

48

68%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

76

78%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

39

42%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

24

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

138

23%

LEVEL 2

235

40%

LEVEL 3

143

24%

LEVEL 4

75

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

177

33%

LEVEL 2

186

35%

LEVEL 3

104

19%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

241
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

133

21%

LEVEL 2

252

40%

LEVEL 3

157

25%

LEVEL 4

84

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

201
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

166

29%

LEVEL 2

206

36%

LEVEL 3

117

20%

LEVEL 4

84

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

18

31%

LEVEL 2

22

38%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

30

44%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.