Skip to Content
Main content

PS 194 RAOUL WALLENBERG GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

82

32%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

91

37%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

42

31%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

49

38%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

40

34%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

42

37%

LEVEL 2

38

34%

LEVEL 3

29

26%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

15

47%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

46

37%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

49

40%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

15

29%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

17

34%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

38

56%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

58

73%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

66

29%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

74
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

19

68%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

12

48%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

76

34%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

85

39%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

68

30%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

79

37%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

14

47%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.