Skip to Content
Main content

RALPH A FABRIZIO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

121

25%

LEVEL 2

106

22%

LEVEL 3

146

30%

LEVEL 4

113

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

67

15%

LEVEL 2

103

23%

LEVEL 3

174

40%

LEVEL 4

96

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

78

39%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

59

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

96

40%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

159
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

49

19%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

74

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

172
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

101

40%

LEVEL 4

71

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

49

47%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

28

37%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

87

21%

LEVEL 3

138

34%

LEVEL 4

112

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

164

44%

LEVEL 4

96

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

47

63%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

35

56%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

246
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

66

19%

LEVEL 3

134

38%

LEVEL 4

112

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

251
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

66

20%

LEVEL 3

155

47%

LEVEL 4

96

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

78

60%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

51

48%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

20

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

22

52%

LEVEL 4

12

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

118

27%

LEVEL 2

97

22%

LEVEL 3

134

30%

LEVEL 4

93

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

66

17%

LEVEL 2

96

24%

LEVEL 3

152

38%

LEVEL 4

84

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

237
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

93

21%

LEVEL 3

136

31%

LEVEL 4

101

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

244
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

83

22%

LEVEL 3

159

42%

LEVEL 4

85

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.