PS 185 WALTER KASSENBROCK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

132

42%

LEVEL 4

84

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

56

19%

LEVEL 3

133

46%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

34

22%

LEVEL 3

67

42%

LEVEL 4

53

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

72

48%

LEVEL 4

47

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

65

42%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

61

44%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

15

50%

LEVEL 4

10

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

9

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

94

41%

LEVEL 4

68

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

96

48%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

26

50%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

47

18%

LEVEL 3

121

47%

LEVEL 4

83

32%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

37

16%

LEVEL 3

121

53%

LEVEL 4

64

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

24

46%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

28

47%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

214
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

60

20%

LEVEL 3

131

44%

LEVEL 4

83

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

196
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

53

19%

LEVEL 3

132

48%

LEVEL 4

64

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

88

49%

LEVEL 4

63

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

87

54%

LEVEL 4

40

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

41

31%

LEVEL 3

44

34%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

26

20%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

24

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.