PS 163 BATH BEACH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

79

19%

LEVEL 2

110

26%

LEVEL 3

145

34%

LEVEL 4

91

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

80

20%

LEVEL 2

96

24%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

83

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

51

24%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

75

36%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

83
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

25

20%

LEVEL 3

45

36%

LEVEL 4

38

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

72
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

42

38%

LEVEL 4

30

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

48

36%

LEVEL 4

28

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

30

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

37

23%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

129

39%

LEVEL 4

87

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

74

24%

LEVEL 3

123

39%

LEVEL 4

80

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

41

43%

LEVEL 2

35

36%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

43

52%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

235
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

42

12%

LEVEL 2

86

24%

LEVEL 3

145

40%

LEVEL 4

90

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

212
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

79

24%

LEVEL 3

130

39%

LEVEL 4

82

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

37

60%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

40

62%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

27

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

18

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

90

26%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

70

21%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

65

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

223
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

101

26%

LEVEL 3

135

34%

LEVEL 4

88

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

204
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

71

20%

LEVEL 2

88

24%

LEVEL 3

127

35%

LEVEL 4

77

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.