JHS 292 MARGARET S DOUGLAS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

190

37%

LEVEL 2

151

29%

LEVEL 3

84

16%

LEVEL 4

95

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

166

33%

LEVEL 2

156

31%

LEVEL 3

95

19%

LEVEL 4

81

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

59

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

62

26%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

123

46%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

104

40%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

44

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

30

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

70
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

96

37%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

80
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

89

35%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

66

45%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

105

26%

LEVEL 2

122

31%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

93

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

98

25%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

79

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

85

70%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

68

60%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

176
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

145

32%

LEVEL 2

136

30%

LEVEL 3

81

18%

LEVEL 4

95

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

173
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

124

29%

LEVEL 2

138

32%

LEVEL 3

92

21%

LEVEL 4

81

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

45

71%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

42

67%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

11

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

10

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

182

37%

LEVEL 2

144

30%

LEVEL 3

77

16%

LEVEL 4

84

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

157

33%

LEVEL 2

151

32%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

71

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

155
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

134

33%

LEVEL 2

119

29%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

89

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

145
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

120

31%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

74

19%

LEVEL 4

71

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

56

50%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

46

43%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.