JHS 218 JAMES P SINNOTT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

209

54%

LEVEL 2

104

27%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

224

56%

LEVEL 2

105

26%

LEVEL 3

49

12%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

92

50%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

92

48%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

117

58%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

132

65%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

33

49%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

30

46%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

84

56%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

99

58%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

84

56%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

92

63%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

133

46%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

150

51%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

76

77%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

74

73%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

144

47%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

65
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

156

50%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

65

84%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

68

80%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

202

55%

LEVEL 2

98

27%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

222

58%

LEVEL 2

101

26%

LEVEL 3

48

12%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

164

50%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

178

54%

LEVEL 2

88

27%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

45

75%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

46

68%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.