Skip to Content
Main content

PS 89 CYPRESS HILLS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

105

38%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

131

45%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

39

28%

LEVEL 2

64

46%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

60

41%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

66

49%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

71

48%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

102

39%

LEVEL 2

105

40%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

127

45%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

92

43%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

79

36%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

38

60%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

52

70%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

50
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

77

51%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

80

65%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

92

71%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

102

40%

LEVEL 2

104

40%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

129

46%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

57
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

97

37%

LEVEL 2

111

42%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

121

43%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.