Skip to Content
Main content

PS 32 SAMUEL MILLS SPROLE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

90

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

73

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

24

22%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

47

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

35

34%

LEVEL 4

42

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

43

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

31

28%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

13

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

54

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

44

56%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

20

43%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

78

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

64

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

12

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

14

32%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

90

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

135
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

73

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

75

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

61

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

18

18%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

33

34%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

90

43%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

132
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

72

37%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

10

59%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.