WINDSOR TERRACE SCHOOL (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

33

14%

LEVEL 3

104

45%

LEVEL 4

88

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

39

17%

LEVEL 3

104

45%

LEVEL 4

78

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

53

42%

LEVEL 4

54

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

49

41%

LEVEL 4

50

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

51

47%

LEVEL 4

34

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

55

49%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

12

60%

LEVEL 4

8

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

13

62%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

68

44%

LEVEL 4

70

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

19

13%

LEVEL 3

74

49%

LEVEL 4

52

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

21

41%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

19

10%

LEVEL 3

93

47%

LEVEL 4

83

42%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

93

49%

LEVEL 4

73

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

7

19%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

21

47%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

192
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

26

12%

LEVEL 3

104

47%

LEVEL 4

88

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

32

14%

LEVEL 3

104

46%

LEVEL 4

78

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

7

78%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

22

11%

LEVEL 3

92

46%

LEVEL 4

84

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

88

46%

LEVEL 4

69

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

16

39%

LEVEL 4

9

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.