Skip to Content
Main content

PS 1 BERGEN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

172

32%

LEVEL 2

202

37%

LEVEL 3

135

25%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

172

34%

LEVEL 2

181

35%

LEVEL 3

139

27%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

82

31%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

102

39%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

90

36%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

145
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

154

32%

LEVEL 2

179

37%

LEVEL 3

116

24%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

143
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

149

33%

LEVEL 2

163

36%

LEVEL 3

127

28%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

100

23%

LEVEL 2

178

41%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

106

25%

LEVEL 2

162

39%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

72

69%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

66

70%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

113

35%

LEVEL 3

126

39%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

115

54%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

111

58%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

16

22%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

20

26%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

27

36%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

156

33%

LEVEL 2

176

38%

LEVEL 3

114

24%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

152

35%

LEVEL 2

156

36%

LEVEL 3

112

26%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

166
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

167

32%

LEVEL 2

195

37%

LEVEL 3

134

25%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

156
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

167

34%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

135

27%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

10

53%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.