JOHN ERICSSON MIDDLE SCHOOL 126 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

102

30%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

122

39%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

30

22%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

28

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

40

32%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

72

35%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

82

44%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

28

40%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

69

30%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

76

35%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

42

60%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

46

69%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

115
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

81

25%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

88
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

100

35%

LEVEL 2

101

35%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

21

81%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

22

88%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

11

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

90

31%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

114

42%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

107
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

82
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

107

38%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

15

52%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.