Skip to Content
Main content

PS 11 PURVIS J BEHAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

69

18%

LEVEL 3

142

37%

LEVEL 4

160

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

67

18%

LEVEL 3

155

42%

LEVEL 4

127

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

173
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

105

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

34

18%

LEVEL 3

86

44%

LEVEL 4

66

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

74

43%

LEVEL 4

55

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

33

19%

LEVEL 3

69

40%

LEVEL 4

61

35%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

13

54%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

9

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

11

35%

LEVEL 4

17

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

12

35%

LEVEL 4

19

56%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

215
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

114

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

200
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

115

43%

LEVEL 4

85

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

20

50%

LEVEL 4

11

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

21

51%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

59

16%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

157

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

152

44%

LEVEL 4

125

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

282
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

65

18%

LEVEL 3

155

43%

LEVEL 4

127

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

173
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

99

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

24

12%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

94

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

68

37%

LEVEL 4

61

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

80

48%

LEVEL 4

33

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

287
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

59

16%

LEVEL 3

135

37%

LEVEL 4

152

42%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

267
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

146

43%

LEVEL 4

121

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.