Skip to Content
Main content

MS 390 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

165

35%

LEVEL 2

161

34%

LEVEL 3

108

23%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

185

39%

LEVEL 2

165

35%

LEVEL 3

96

20%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

51

24%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

114

43%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

117

46%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

23

36%

LEVEL 2

25

39%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

125
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

143

35%

LEVEL 2

136

34%

LEVEL 3

90

22%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

158

40%

LEVEL 2

136

34%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

112

29%

LEVEL 2

130

34%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

129

34%

LEVEL 2

135

36%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

53

55%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

56

59%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

72

20%

LEVEL 2

131

37%

LEVEL 3

107

30%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

144

40%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

93

75%

LEVEL 2

30

24%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

91

80%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

164

35%

LEVEL 2

157

33%

LEVEL 3

106

23%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

180

40%

LEVEL 2

155

34%

LEVEL 3

91

20%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

99

31%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

97
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

117

34%

LEVEL 2

129

38%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

66

42%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

68

52%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.