Skip to Content
Main content

PS 107 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

89

38%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

64

28%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

54

46%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

30

26%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

39

34%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

44

37%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

34

29%

LEVEL 2

48

41%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

26

30%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

25

35%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

53

41%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

38

44%

LEVEL 2

36

41%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

47

46%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

78
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

83

39%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

84
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

64

28%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

16

29%

LEVEL 2

26

46%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

20

48%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.