Skip to Content
Main content

PS 69 JOURNEY PREP SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

115

43%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

70

24%

LEVEL 3

131

45%

LEVEL 4

69

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

61

46%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

60

41%

LEVEL 4

43

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

54

40%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

71

50%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

23

51%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

22

50%

LEVEL 4

14

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

128
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

88

41%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

157
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

103

44%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

90

45%

LEVEL 4

42

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

100

47%

LEVEL 4

60

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

14

20%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

25

36%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

31

41%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

160
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

111

44%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

195
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

128

46%

LEVEL 4

67

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

12

63%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

23

52%

LEVEL 4

14

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

102

43%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

108

44%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

101

43%

LEVEL 4

46

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

180
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

115

44%

LEVEL 4

65

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

14

41%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

16

57%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.