Skip to Content
Main content

PS 153 ADAM CLAYTON POWELL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

73

31%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

55

42%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

45

38%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

41

33%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

46

38%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

14

31%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

53

28%

LEVEL 2

82

43%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

58

33%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

53

30%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

54

24%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

13

43%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

24

65%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

70

38%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

65

40%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

32

47%

LEVEL 2

30

44%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

39

52%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

65

27%

LEVEL 2

96

41%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

69

32%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

51

24%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

21

50%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.