PS 128 AUDUBON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

79

34%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

51

22%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

77

32%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

50

45%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

47

38%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

53

44%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

49

42%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

78

35%

LEVEL 2

85

38%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

74

32%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

78

43%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

73

38%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

33

69%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

32

62%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

61
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

67

43%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

90
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

74

43%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

51

68%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

48

68%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

10

53%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

79

35%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

76

34%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

46
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

70

42%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

28

36%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

27

35%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.