Skip to Content
Main content

PS 116 MARY LINDLEY MURRAY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

104

46%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

39

20%

LEVEL 3

91

46%

LEVEL 4

51

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

54

46%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

44

41%

LEVEL 4

32

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

50

45%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

47

52%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

24

53%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

21

48%

LEVEL 4

19

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

44

48%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

44

54%

LEVEL 4

20

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

16

37%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

19

42%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

96

52%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

25

15%

LEVEL 3

80

49%

LEVEL 4

51

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

19

44%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

147
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

102

47%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

141
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

90

47%

LEVEL 4

51

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

75

52%

LEVEL 4

39

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

17

13%

LEVEL 3

65

50%

LEVEL 4

45

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

19

23%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

29

35%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

13

19%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

26

39%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

93

46%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

86

48%

LEVEL 4

50

28%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

11

46%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.