Skip to Content
Main content

PS 41 GREENWICH VILLAGE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

34

11%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

169

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

48

15%

LEVEL 3

139

44%

LEVEL 4

113

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

106

60%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

22

13%

LEVEL 3

65

39%

LEVEL 4

74

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

63

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

74

50%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

21

68%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

35
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

18

41%

LEVEL 4

17

39%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

10

63%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

20

9%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

118

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

174
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

93

43%

LEVEL 4

81

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

14

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

15

45%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

13

5%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

158

63%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

25

10%

LEVEL 3

123

49%

LEVEL 4

104

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

31
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

21

35%

LEVEL 3

20

33%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

251
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

44

14%

LEVEL 3

138

45%

LEVEL 4

113

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

244
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

30

11%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

160

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

125

44%

LEVEL 4

109

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

9

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

14

52%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.