EXPLORE CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

75

22%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

111

33%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

109

32%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

58

36%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

53

30%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

120
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

126
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

19

43%

LEVEL 3

11

25%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

22

48%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

21

53%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

141
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

116

36%

LEVEL 3

109

33%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

152
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

107

33%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

19

22%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

29

34%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

16

24%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

87

32%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

139
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

116

36%

LEVEL 3

107

33%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.