PS 20 ANNA SILVER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

50

25%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

32

30%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

31

30%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

34

35%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

30

38%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

35

38%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

29

33%

LEVEL 2

36

41%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

25

66%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

74
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

38

23%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

18

33%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

55

36%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

41

29%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

17

47%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

14

61%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.